Downloads

  1. REVIEW APPLICATION – NOTICE OF MOTION
  2. REVIEW APPLICATION – FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT (BUNDLE 1)
  3. REVIEW APPLICATION – JSE DECISION (BUNDLE 2)
  4. REVIEW APPLICATION – EXPERT REPORT OF TAPIWA NJIKIZANA (BUNDLE 3)
  5. REVIEW APPLICATION – TRANSCRIPT (BUNDLE 4)
  6. REVIEW APPLICATION – TRANSCRIPT (BUNDLE 5)
  7. REVIEW APPLICATION – TAPIWA NJIKIZANA’S CONFIRMATORY AFFIDAVIT
  8. REVIEW APPLICATION – REASONS IN TERMS OF UNIFORM RULE 53 (1)(B)
  9. REVIEW APPLICATION – SUPPLEMENTARY FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT
  10. REVIEW APPLICATION – SECOND RESPONDENT’S FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT
  11. REVIEW APPLICATION – TRUSTCO’S REPLYING AFFIDAVIT
  12. REVIEW APPLICATION – APPLICANT’S HEADS OF ARGUMENT
  13. REVIEW APPLICATION – APPLICANT’S LIST OF AUTHORITIES
  14. REVIEW APPLICATION – JSE HEADS OF ARGUMENT
  15. REVIEW APPLICATION – JUDGMENT TGH V FRIP – POTTERILL J
  16. REVIEW APPLICATION – TRUSTCO APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
  17. REVIEW APPLICATION – JSE HEADS OF ARGUMENT TO LEAVE TO APPEAL
  18. REVIEW APPLICATION – COURT ORDER
  19. REVIEW APPLICATION – TGH FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT
  20. REVIEW APPLICATION – JSE ANSWERING AFFIDAVIT 2
  21. REVIEW APPLICATION – TGH REPLYING AFFIDAVIT

  22. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION
  23. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSION AND FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT
  24. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – JSE RESPONSE TO TRUSTCO’S APPLICATION WITH ANNEXURES
  25. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – TGH REPLYING AFFIDAVIT
  26. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – RULING JUSTICE MOKGORO – APP ITO SEC 231 OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR REGULATION
  27. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – TRUSTCO HEADS OF ARGUMENT
  28. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – JSE’S HEADS OF ARGUMENT
  29. SUSPENSION APPLICATION – DECISION

  30. URGENT APPLICATION – TGH ISSUED NOTICE OF MOTION
  31. URGENT APPLICATION – TGH FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT
  32. URGENT APPLICATION – FIRST RESPONDENT ANSWERING AFFIDAVIT
  33. URGENT APPLICATION – TGH REPLYING AFFIDAVIT
  34. URGENT APPLICATION – TRUSTCO HEADS OF ARGUMENT
  35. URGENT APPLICATION – JSE HEADS OF ARGUMENT
  36. URGENT APPLICATION – JUDGMENT – JANSE VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN J